Create an Account

Already have account?

Forgot Your Password ?

Home / Questions / Suppose a law is passed that prohibits farmers from using certain chemical fertilizers bec...

Suppose a law is passed that prohibits farmers from using certain chemical fertilizers because the excess runs of and contaminates nearby ground water. The expected reduction in illness to water users

Suppose a law is passed that prohibits farmers from using certain chemical fertilizers because the excess runs of and contaminates nearby ground water. The expected reduction in illness to water users is $10 million. The farmers experience an $8 million loss from switching to a more expensive fertilizer. a. Does the introduction of the law represent a Pareto improvement relative to the status quo? Is it a Kaldor-Hicks improvement? Explain. b. Suppose the government taxes water users and uses the revenue to fully compensate farmers for their losses. Is the law now a Pareto improvement relative to the initial allocation? Is it a Kaldor-Hicks improvement relative to the initial allocation? Explain.

Suppose a law is passed that prohibits farmers from using certain chemical fertilizers because the excess runs of and contami

Jun 10 2021 View more View Less

Answer (Solved)

question Subscribe To Get Solution

Related Questions